[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: QNames
This was discussed momentarily. I think James didn't like it. As you say, we deferred QNames overall until next time. -Mike -----Original Message----- From: David RR Webber [mailto:Gnosis_@compuserve.com] Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 12:08 PM To: Michael Fitzgerald Subject: RE: QNames Mike, Did this get decided today? I like what you have here. I recall we are on to discuss this next week.... Thanks, DW. ================================================== Message text written by Michael Fitzgerald > BTW: I am suggesting this follow on to Murata-san's original proxy scheme IN ADDITION to QNames, not as a complete replacement. In that spirit, it give people the option of avoiding using QNames if they want. I believe that having that extra option will make some people VERY happy. -Mike I think Makoto's proxy idea is very appealing. Rather than introducing a new concept, though, couldn't we just use the prefix as the proxy name and then just overload the ns attribute? Consider: <grammar xmlns:e="http://www.example.com/e" proxy="yes"> <start> <element name="addressBook" ns="e"> <zeroOrMore> <element name="card" ns="e"> <element name="name" ns="e"> <text/> </element> <element name="email" ns="e" > <text/> </element> </element> </zeroOrMore> </element> </start> </grammmar> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC