[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: Issue: overriding attributes
> everything seems to translate quite straightfowardly. However, there's one > capability that W3C XML Schema has which we don't have. That is not the only one we don't have. - the capability to declare patterns as a restriction of another and let the processor check it. - multipart key - runtime type substitution by using xsi:type. From the way I see it, this is by far the biggest problem. - lax validation ... and more. So as for your proposal, I don't think it's necessary. 1. I don't think its widely used, nor it's a good technique as David says. 2. The complexity for the implementation/spec is non-trivial. regards, -- Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI +1 650 786 0721 Sun Microsystems kohsuke.kawaguchi@sun.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC