[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: Alternative approach for key/keyref
Murata Makoto wrote: > I will extend my rewrite, but I don't think inference rules are absolutely > required. 7.2 does not have any inference rules and this is just fine. Here is my rewrite of 7.2. This is based on what James suggested. James Clark wrote: > I think a more restrictive constraint is a little bit more natural than the > one that Murata-san proposed. Specifically, > > - for an attribute, the key-type can depend on the attribute name and the > element name (this is the same as Murata-san's proposal) > > - for an element, the key-type can depend on the element name only (in > Murata-san's proposal, if I understood correctly, it could also depend on > the parent element's name) In my opinion, this rewrite is away easier to understand than the current text. Since 7.2 becomes away simpler, we might even want to move 7.1 and 7.2 before 6. Cheers, Makoto
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC