Re: a:attributeType

[James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>]

> > I agree.  How about the following?
>
> This is reasonable.  (I might want to merge 1.1 and 1.2 for convenience.)

I wasn't suggesting 1.1 and 1.2 would be separate specs, rather separate
sections of a single spec.

> Another possibility is to allow implementations to support only
ID/IDREF/IDREFS
> of XML Schema Part 2.

I would want to allow this as well.

> After all, few implementations will support all datatypes and facets of
> XML Schema Part 2.  If subsetting is likely to arise anyway, we might want
> to ask implementors to explicitly list supported datatypes and facets.

Our guidelines for XML Schema Part 2 could say this.

James