[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: Test suite for RELAX NG DTD compatibility spec.
> I agree that the set of metadata elements needs to be extensible, but I > still don't think we need header to get this. For example, we can do what > we do in RELAX NG and allow arbitrary namespaced qualified elements. OK. That seems to be fine. > I noticed you have a metadata element for saying whether it depends on a > XML Schema namespaces. How about something like > > <requires datatypeLibrary="http://..."/> > > Any others? Not off the top of my head. I guess we can add elements later if necessary. > Allowing resources both in <testCase>s and in <testSuite>s would make > things rather complicated. Umm, then I'd rather propose to pull out <resource> on the ground that 1. use of resources involves use of <externalRef>s and <include>s; it is hard to write a generic (processor-dependent) test framework that properly resolves those resources for the processor. 2. there probably are test cases that cannot be written by using the test suite format anyway (e.g., a test case that uses DTD.) I said that I'm using resources to share common file between test cases, but it was not quite correct. I do have test cases that share a file between test cases, but they are not in this suite format; they are just a bunch of small files now. How does this sound for you? Or <resource>s are too vital for you to throw away? regards, -- Kohsuke KAWAGUCHI +1 650 786 0721 Sun Microsystems kohsuke.kawaguchi@sun.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC