[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [relax-ng] close schema language
MURATA Makoto wrote: > Michael Fitzgerald wrote: > > >>I was wondering what people think of these comments on closed schema >>languages on XML-DEV. >> > > I see some advantages in assertion-based schema languages such as Schematron. > But I have always wondered why Rick Jelliffe opposes to other languages. > What he calls "closed" is not a hangover from DBMS. Does he really think > DocBook and TEI are such hangovers? "Closed" content models are sometimes > (or often) required. Schematron is the only language I know where "everything which is not forbidden is allowed", the main principle of the other languages being rather that "everything which is not allowed is forbidden" which, by itself, is "closed". I think then that the opposition between assertion-based and structure-based languages is only a partial explanation of a deepest difference between Schematron and the other languages. Partial, because it is possible to imagine assertion-based languages where "everything which is not allowed is forbidden" but it would seem less natural to define structure-based languages where "everything which is not forbidden is allowed". Eric -- Rendez-vous à Paris pour le Forum XML. http://www.technoforum.fr/Pages/forumXML01/index.html ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com http://xsltunit.org http://4xt.org http://examplotron.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC