RE: [rights-requirements] Requirements Rev 14 - Proposed

[Bob Atkinson <bobatk@Exchange.Microsoft.com>]

I think it would be a mistake to call out the issuer of the permissions
in such a definition. They certainly may come from parties other than
those you list.

	Bob

-----Original Message-----
From: John Erickson [mailto:john_erickson@hplb.hpl.hp.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 7:59 AM
To: rights-requirements@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [rights-requirements] Requirements Rev 14 - Proposed

I'm wondering if it would be appropriate to include language such as:
"...By
'permissions' we mean a set of usage rules declared by the originator or
provider of an object or service, that is used by a compliant
interpreter (such
as a virtual machine) to control a recipient's access to and usage of
the object
or service...."

----- Original Message -----
From: "Reddy, Hari" <Hari.Reddy@CONTENTGUARD.COM>
To: <rights-requirements@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 10:17 PM
Subject: [rights-requirements] Requirements Rev 14 - Proposed


Requirements Rev 14 - Proposed

Hello Everyone:
For Wed's meeting, I have integrated the introduction from Parama and
reformated
the Requirements Document. I am submitting this as Rev 14 - Proposed
since we
need to discuss the introduction.

Regards,
Hari






----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>