Registry

[<Stavros.Isaiadis@uk.fujitsu.com>]

Hi all,

 

Trying to summarize our recent discussions:

-          We should add a type registry to hold Symptoms types and (possibly) Prescription Types, as these are building blocks in SAF.

-          On the contrary, registries/directories of entity instances (e.g. Practitioners, Diagnosticians, Symptom Sources available in the system) will be left out of the spec and as an implementation choice. Any reasonable implementation should have such capabilities anyway.

-          We throw away the current bulk/coarse interfaces and provide more fine grained operations –at the abstract level in the spec but with a REST (and later WS?) binding as an appendix (?)

 

I will try to implement these changes in our current implementation and specification asap. Next step would be a REST-like "entry point" to a SAF testbed for experimentation.

 

Cheers,

 

Stavros

 

--

Fujitsu Laboratories of Europe

______________________________________________________________________
                                        
 Fujitsu Laboratories of Europe Limited
 Hayes Park Central, Hayes End Road, Hayes, Middlesex, UB4 8FE
 Registered No. 4153469
 
 This e-mail and any attachments are for the sole use of addressee(s) and
 may contain information which is privileged and confidential. Unauthorised
 use or copying for disclosure is strictly prohibited. The fact that this
 e-mail has been scanned by Trendmicro Interscan does not guarantee that 
 it has not been intercepted or amended nor that it is virus-free.