I added the following POST-BALLOT NOTE to the
eballot proposal comment for
Issue #321, “Provide mechanism for inlining externalized properties data into the root log.”
Erratum: The name of the new property should be
inlineExternalPropertyFiles, and it is an array of
(as defined in §4.3 of the spec), not
If you look at all the examples above, you'll see that they really are arrays of
objects. @kupsch's first example proposed to name the new property
which would be ok. Later in the thread, I proposed
inlineExternalProperties, as suggested
here, which I prefer because it matches the name of the objects in the array.
as we proposed in the ballot, is just wrong. There is an object in the spec called
but it is just a "locator" for an external file. Our new
property contains the contents of "external" files, not locators for them.
I do not expect this to change anyone’s vote. This really is essentially a typo, as you can see by looking at the examples further up the issue’s discussion thread.