RE: [sca-assembly] Unapproved Conformance Guidelines

["Martin Chapman" <martin.chapman@oracle.com>]

I agreee, and I think we have a few already. 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: ashok malhotra [mailto:ashok.malhotra@oracle.com] 
>Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2007 3:05 PM
>To: Martin Chapman
>Cc: 'OASIS Assembly'
>Subject: Re: [sca-assembly] Unapproved Conformance Guidelines
>
>
>Martin, this is an excellent start.
>
>I'm thinking about negative tests.  In conversation you have said that 
>MUST NOT statements should be specific about where and when 
>the error is 
>raised.  If we go that far, why don't we specify an error code 
>as well.  
>This will further improve interoperability.
>In some of the WGs I've worked in, people asked for error 
>codes when the 
>spec got close to finished.  We may as well start thinking 
>about this early. Ashok
>
>Martin Chapman wrote:
>
>>These have no official standing (yet) but might be of help.
>>
>>Martin.
>>
>>_________________________________________________________________
>>Martin Chapman                                 
>>Consulting Member of Technical Staff           
>>Oracle                                        
>>P: +353 87 687 6654                           
>>e: martin.chapman@oracle.com                   
>>  
>>
>>--------------------------------------------------------------
>---------
>>-
>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that 
>>generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all 
>your TCs in 
>>OASIS
>>at:
>>https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgr
>oups.php 
>>
>
>
>-- 
>All the best, Ashok
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS 
>TC that generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and 
>all your TCs in OASIS
>at: 
>https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php 
>
>