[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [sca-assembly] ISSUE 11: Define Conformance Targets
From: Martin Chapman [mailto:martin.chapman@oracle.com]
Sent: Monday, Dec 17, 2007 10:11 AM
To: 'Mike Edwards'; 'OASIS Assembly'
Subject: RE: [sca-assembly] ISSUE 11: Define Conformance TargetsI am not sure why this has to be a conformance target for Assembly.The Assembly spec should define the rules for extension, and generically what is required of a binding and an implementation type, but surely each binding and impl type becomes a conformance target in its own right, and in its own spec?Martin.-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Edwards [mailto:mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 4:40 PM
To: OASIS Assembly
Subject: [sca-assembly] ISSUE 11: Define Conformance Targets
Folks,
I'd like to add one additional class of conformance targets to the ones identified in Martin's proposal:
- Other SCA specifications
I have seen a couple of examples of this type in the Assembly specification.
These cases cover specifications for the extension elements of SCA, principally - ie Implementation types and
Binding types. The requirements are for the specification to define functionality explicitly. If the function is not
specified in those documents, there is a hole.
Yours, Mike.
Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014 Mobile: +44-7802-467431
Email: mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]