Re: [sca-assembly] ISSUE 8 - Artifact resolution - proposal V4

[Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>]

David Booz wrote:
> 1) @location is only needed when there is more than one matching export 
> in the Domain which provides the same artifact (e.g. QName).
> 

Ok, that makes sense.
Follow up Qs:
1) Is it considered an error if there is no location on import and there 
is > 1 matching export? OR is the runtime allowed to pick one?
2) I also am assuming that in the case there is exactly one matching 
export in the Domain, the import is still allowed to set the location.


> 2) Those mechanisms are covered earlier in the document, and pre-exist 
> this proposal. They'd be used before the SCA import/export mechanism 
> would as stated in the spec. I think Mike E said this on the last 
> telecon, just wanted to make sure.

I must have missed that, I joined late.
Thanks.

-Anish
--

> 
> Dave Booz
> STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture
> Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC
> "Distributed objects first, then world hunger"
> Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093
> e-mail:booz@us.ibm.com
> Inactive hide details for Anish Karmarkar 
> <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>
> 
> 
>                         *Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>*
> 
>                         09/16/2008 10:26 AM
> 
> 	
> 
> To
> 	
> David Booz/Poughkeepsie/IBM@IBMUS
> 
> cc
> 	
> sca-assembly@lists.oasis-open.org
> 
> Subject
> 	
> Re: [sca-assembly] ISSUE 8 - Artifact resolution - proposal V4
> 
> 	
> 
> 
> Two questions:
> 
> 1) Pseudo schema for import is as follows:
> <import namespace="xs:String" location=”xs:AnyURI”?/>*
> Why is location optional?
> 
> 2) Section 11.2.1 says:
> "1. from the contribution’s direct dependencies by resolving its sca
> import statements. Dependencies MUST NOT be searched recursively in
> order to locate artifacts.
> 2. from the contents of the contribution itself."
> 
> How do things like schemaLocation/wsdlLoction fit here? Is that
> considered to be part of bullet 2?
> 
> -Anish
> --
> 
> David Booz wrote:
>  > Here is the latest proposal for Issue 8.  It includes the updated words
>  > from Mike E in section 6.6.
>  >
>  > While I haven't received the use cases from Anish (AI 2008-07-22-3), 
> I took
>  > a shot at rewording the body of the changes in 11.2.1 anyway.
>  >
>  > This closes my AI 2008-07-22-4.
>  >
>  >
>  > (See attached file: Issue8-proposal-v4-sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd01.doc)
>  >
>  > Dave Booz
>  > STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture
>  > Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC
>  > "Distributed objects first, then world hunger"
>  > Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093  or  8-295-6093
>  > e-mail:booz@us.ibm.com
>  >
>  >
>  > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >
>  > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
>  > generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
>  > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php 
>