[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: ISSUE 5: component type allows to specify wire targets on references
Re: my action item 2008-10-30-5, to create a proposal for a potential solution for issue 5 I've been trying to reconstruct our discussion from the F2F, but I need a little help from others present. (I cannot find my notes, and they were pretty minimal in any case.) According to my recollection, Mike likes wire targets on references in a componentType to support what I'll call the "PHP use-case": a very simple deployment mechanism of dropping files in a folder. In that scenario, the developer and deployer are likely to be the same user, so the developer may reasonably know what services the deployer has deployed. I don't dispute the use-case, but I suggested (IIRC) that the simple deployment mechanism would necessarily consist of generating some deployment artifacts from the annotated PHP script dropped in the folder, and those generated artifacts need not be limited to a ComponentType; a deployment Composite could just as easily be generated, and that could easily represent the wire that the deployer included via annotation. Put another way, PHP script annotations need not be restricted to producing a ComponentType, and could, in fact, produce a default deployment Composite. This is where my memory runs out, and I'd like to ask Mike to remind me what his counterpoint was... I've lost it. I suggest that we carry this discussion on via email, rather than wasting time on the call. Scott
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]