sca-assembly message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [sca-assembly] CD 03 zip file uploaded - Now ready to Submit forPublication and Public Review
- From: Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com>
- To: OASIS Assembly <sca-assembly@lists.oasis-open.org>
- Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 10:46:51 +0000
Folks,
First, many thanks to Anish for getting
this done.
The PDF needs regenerating - I will
ask Dave Booz to do this, but there are a number of formatting
errors in there (not in the Word or
the HTML), plus the lack of live links.
I'd like to ask about the RDDL - is
it easy to get the RDDL updated as and when the new XSDs
get approved?
Unless someone screams, I intend to
submit this package for publication later today and to formally
request the start of the public review,
with the only change being an updated clean version of
the PDF.
Yours, Mike.
Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014 Mobile: +44-7802-467431
Email: mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com
From:
| Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>
|
To:
| OASIS Assembly <sca-assembly@lists.oasis-open.org>
|
Date:
| 18/03/2009 07:35
|
Subject:
| [sca-assembly] CD 03 zip file uploaded |
Located at:
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-assembly/download.php/31728/sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd03.zip
It contains CD03 doc/pdf/html (no diff-marks), CD03 doc/pdf/html (diff
with cd02), all the schemas, intent definitions, and RDDL.
Please note the following:
1) The spec is based on the old cd03 (cd02-rev8) and was changed per the
CD03 approval motion.
2) The schemas were based on the ones that MikeE sent out [1], but
modified per the CD03 approval motion.
3) The RDDL was based on [2] and not on the one sent out by Bryan [3].
Mary had made changes when we published CD01, those changes were not
reflected in Bryan's version.
4) The RDDL currently does not contain pointers to schemas from TCs that
have not approved a CD with the new NS. I assume as other TCs approve
their specs the RDDL will get updated.
5) The HTML version is straight from MS word. I have not attempted to
Tidy it up or clean up the Word round-tripping markup. If someone wants
to do that, please do so and update the zip file.
6) The PDFs do not contain links for TOCs. Dave has the magic wand to
produce PDFs that have that.
7) My version of word shows some strange things wrt the tags (ASMXXXXX)
and the highlighting. The "strange things" is only wrt
change-mark/yellow color (not content). I *think* I 'fixed' all of it,
but pl. check.
8) We did not publish CD02. I included CD02 as previous version on the
front page of the spec. Do we need to change it to CD01?
9) The way the schemas are hosted on docs.oasis-open.org, they are all
in the same directory and not in the dated (200903/200712) directory.
This is an issue with OASIS, and goes against the decision that the TC
made. This may cause broken links (like it did in CD01). We need to get
this fixed.
If you see any errors please send it to the list.
-Anish
--
[1] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-assembly/200903/msg00077.html
[2] http://docs.oasis-open.org/opencsa/sca-assembly/scanamespace.html
[3] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-assembly/200903/msg00111.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]