[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [sca-assembly] CD 03 zip file uploaded
Bryan Aupperle wrote: > > What were the changes Mary made to the RDDL for CD01? > > The RDDL I sent out is based on the current OASIS template but the CD01 > version (and the one in this zip) are based on an earlier template. > Mary pointed me to the new template in December when I was preparing > the RDDL docs for the SDO TC. I suspect she is going to what us to use > the new template for this CD/PRD. > I have updated the RDDL you had sent out and fixed a few things in it. I'll update the zip file to contain two different RDDL docs: sca-1.1-rddl-200903.html and sca-1.1-rddl-200903-newtemplate.html The TC admin can pick which ever is the correct format. -Anish -- > Bryan Aupperle, Ph.D. > STSM, WebSphere Enterprise Platform Software Solution Architect > > Research Triangle Park, NC > +1 919-254-7508 (T/L 444-7508) > Internet Address: aupperle@us.ibm.com > > > *Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>* > > 03/18/2009 03:35 AM > > > To > OASIS Assembly <sca-assembly@lists.oasis-open.org> > cc > > Subject > [sca-assembly] CD 03 zip file uploaded > > > > > > > > > Located at: > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-assembly/download.php/31728/sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd03.zip > > It contains CD03 doc/pdf/html (no diff-marks), CD03 doc/pdf/html (diff > with cd02), all the schemas, intent definitions, and RDDL. > > Please note the following: > > 1) The spec is based on the old cd03 (cd02-rev8) and was changed per the > CD03 approval motion. > > 2) The schemas were based on the ones that MikeE sent out [1], but > modified per the CD03 approval motion. > > 3) The RDDL was based on [2] and not on the one sent out by Bryan [3]. > Mary had made changes when we published CD01, those changes were not > reflected in Bryan's version. > > 4) The RDDL currently does not contain pointers to schemas from TCs that > have not approved a CD with the new NS. I assume as other TCs approve > their specs the RDDL will get updated. > > 5) The HTML version is straight from MS word. I have not attempted to > Tidy it up or clean up the Word round-tripping markup. If someone wants > to do that, please do so and update the zip file. > > 6) The PDFs do not contain links for TOCs. Dave has the magic wand to > produce PDFs that have that. > > 7) My version of word shows some strange things wrt the tags (ASMXXXXX) > and the highlighting. The "strange things" is only wrt > change-mark/yellow color (not content). I *think* I 'fixed' all of it, > but pl. check. > > 8) We did not publish CD02. I included CD02 as previous version on the > front page of the spec. Do we need to change it to CD01? > > 9) The way the schemas are hosted on docs.oasis-open.org, they are all > in the same directory and not in the dated (200903/200712) directory. > This is an issue with OASIS, and goes against the decision that the TC > made. This may cause broken links (like it did in CD01). We need to get > this fixed. > > If you see any errors please send it to the list. > > -Anish > -- > > [1] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-assembly/200903/msg00077.html > [2] http://docs.oasis-open.org/opencsa/sca-assembly/scanamespace.html > [3] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-assembly/200903/msg00111.html > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]