sca-assembly message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [sca-assembly] NEW ISSUE: What is a constrainingType file supposed tolook like?
- From: Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com>
- To: sca-assembly@lists.oasis-open.org
- Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 19:20:22 +0100
Logged as http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/ASSEMBLY-139
Yours, Mike.
Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014 Mobile: +44-7802-467431
Email: mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com
From:
| David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com>
|
To:
| sca-assembly@lists.oasis-open.org
|
Date:
| 03/06/2009 13:53
|
Subject:
| [sca-assembly] NEW ISSUE: What is a
constrainingType file supposed to look like? |
TARGET: SCA Assembly spec, PRD/CD03.
DESCRIPTION:
constrainingType is defined as a top level element in the SCA XSD.
There is then a statement relating to "Constraining type document"
in Section 13.1, which implies that
they are defined as separate files in the Domain. However, there are no
statements about location and
naming of these files anywhere, particularly in section 6 which covers
constrainingType.
PROPOSAL:
None
Dave Booz
STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture
Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC
"Distributed objects first, then world hunger"
Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093
e-mail:booz@us.ibm.com
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]