sca-assembly message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [sca-assembly] [ASSEMBLY 147] Assembly Specification does not definethe Component Type of a Composite used as an Implementation
- From: Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com>
- To: OASIS Assembly <sca-assembly@lists.oasis-open.org>
- Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 08:46:03 +0100
Simon,
Thanks for checking up on this - so
my memory wasn't playing me tricks, thank goodness.
Yours, Mike.
Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014 Mobile: +44-7802-467431
Email: mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com
From:
| Simon Nash <oasis@cjnash.com>
|
To:
| Mike Edwards/UK/IBM@IBMGB
|
Cc:
| OASIS Assembly <sca-assembly@lists.oasis-open.org>
|
Date:
| 08/09/2009 17:37
|
Subject:
| Re: [sca-assembly] [ASSEMBLY 147] Assembly
Specification does not define the Component Type of a Composite used as
an Implementation |
Mike,
This is a follow-up to the discussion on today's call about the
value of the wiredByImpl attribute in the component type for a
composite implementation.
You are correct that the case I was describing on the call is an
error case. Prior to the resolution of ASSEMBLY-136 this was legal,
but that resolution has changed the rules in this area.
Given this, I think the wording you have for this bullet is fine.
Simon
Mike Edwards wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
> I've produced an updated proposal for Issue 147. The following
have
> been addressed:
>
> 1) @autowire inheritance - I have discovered that @autowire is not
> described for composite references, even though the attribute is present
> in the
> XSD. I have raised an issue calling for @autowire to be removed
from
> the XSD for composite references.
>
> 2) @wiredByImpl inheritance - is dealt with in this proposal
>
> 3) Inheritance of intents - is dealt with by a reference to the Policy
> specification
>
> 4) Inheritance of <callback/> elements - is not described in
the main
> body of the specification and so is left OUT of this proposal.
> I have raised a separate issue to deal with the absence of a description
> of <callback/> inheritance.
>
> All changes are in section 5.5.1.
>
> The revised proposal is here:
>
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-assembly/download.php/34083/sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd03%2BIssue_147a.pdf
>
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-assembly/download.php/34082/sca-assembly-1.1-spec-cd03%2BIssue_147a.doc
>
>
> Yours, Mike.
>
> Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
> Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
> IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
> Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014 Mobile: +44-7802-467431
> Email: mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> /
> /
>
> /Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with
number
> 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire
PO6 3AU/
>
>
>
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]