sca-assembly message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [sca-assembly] NEW ISSUE: Policy assumptions for 100002 and 100003
- From: Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com>
- To: OASIS Assembly <sca-assembly@lists.oasis-open.org>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 09:27:26 +0000
Logged as: http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/ASSEMBLY-207
Yours, Mike.
Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014 Mobile: +44-7802-467431
Email: mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com
From:
| Jim Marino <jim.marino@gmail.com>
|
To:
| OASIS Assembly <sca-assembly@lists.oasis-open.org>
|
Date:
| 11/01/2010 18:17
|
Subject:
| [sca-assembly] NEW ISSUE: Policy assumptions
for 100002 and 100003 |
TARGET: SCA Assembly Conformance Tests
DESCRIPTION:
TEST_ASM_10002 and TEST_ASM_10003 are duplicates, which
is probably a bug. Both tests should contain a statement that a policy
set for the test intent needs to be added to the runtime prior to the test
run. This is because a runtime can throw an error stating the intent cannot
be resolved. Note the tests expect a sucessful result which is probably
invalid.
SVN Version: 426
PROPOSAL:
Refactor the tests to contain an empty policy set definition
that needs to be replaced by a vendor running the tests.
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]