Issue 250 - autowire

[Peter Niblett <peter_niblett@uk.ibm.com>]

Eric

I don't think that the fact that something
has been defined for service/references necessarily means we have to have
it for events. We already have indirection between the event producers
and consumers via channels, so I would like to explore what the problem
is with channels.

In your description of 250, you indicate
that some sort of scoping mechanism is required, to avoid a complete free
for all - but isn't that just what channels are intended for? If you want
free exchange of events between any producer and consumer you just attach
them to a global channel - for example the default domain channel which
is provided for exactly this purpose. If you want to restrict the scope
to the local composite, you attach them to a local channel.  

Is the issue here that you see a need
for scopes somewhere in between these two extremes?  This, incidentally,
is something I think also underlies the 227 question.

Regards

Peter Niblett
IBM Senior Technical Staff Member
Member of the IBM Academy of Technology
+44 1962 815055
+44 7825 657662 (mobile)

---

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU