Re: [sca-assembly] Exit Criteria Proposal

[Eric Johnson <eric@tibco.com>]

Hi Ashok,

Which is funny, because I read it as "for each normative statement, there exist at least two implementations," especially since the work "every" doesn't appear in Mike's original. That is, Mike could have written: "there shall be at least 2 independent SCA runtimes that are compliant with every normative portion of the specification..."

I think Jim's concern is reasonable in theory. In practice, since Tuscany can claim conformance, as I understand it, then is this question moot?

-Eric.

On 6/13/11 3:43 PM, ashok malhotra wrote:

4DF69279.5090800@oracle.com" type="cite"> Jim:
Mike's proposal says ...

3042018C-CB7B-4C16-9B7F-657A86C1EB53@gmail.com" type="cite">there shall be at least 2 independent SCA runtimes that are compliant
with each normative portion of the specification as described in Section ...

I read this as saying "two independent runtimes, each of which complies
with every normative statement in ... "

Ashok