[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: NEW ISSUE: What is a "plain name" for a connection factories or activationspecs, and how is one distinguished from a JNDI name?
Target: JMS Binding specification Description: In the definition of the binding.jms/activationSpec, binding.jms/response/activationSpec, binding.jms/connectionFactory, and binding.jms/response/connectionFactory elements, the spec introduces the notion of a "plain name". This notion of plain name is not defined anywhere, and either needs a reference, or needs to be defined in this specification. Further, it is not clear that it is possible, in the general case, to distinguish a JNDI name from a "plain" name. Proposal: Either remove the reference to "plain" names, or provide the context to make these meaningful and clearly distinct from JNDI names. If "plain" names are really a notion of vendor extension, we should formalize how these extensions happen.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]