[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [sca-bindings] ISSUE-31: What is a "plain name" for a connectionfactories or activation specs, and how is one distinguished from a JNDI name?
Logged as http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-31 -Eric. Eric Johnson wrote: > Target: JMS Binding specification > > Description: > In the definition of the binding.jms/activationSpec, > binding.jms/response/activationSpec, binding.jms/connectionFactory, > and binding.jms/response/connectionFactory elements, the spec > introduces the notion of a "plain name". This notion of plain name is > not defined anywhere, and either needs a reference, or needs to be > defined in this specification. > > Further, it is not clear that it is possible, in the general case, to > distinguish a JNDI name from a "plain" name. > > Proposal: > Either remove the reference to "plain" names, or provide the context > to make these meaningful and clearly distinct from JNDI names. > > If "plain" names are really a notion of vendor extension, we should > formalize how these extensions happen. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in > OASIS > at: > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]