[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [sca-bindings] NEW ISSUE: Does WSDL binding take precedend over policyintents
Mike Edwards pointed out that I forgot a very important NOT in the
description below. It should read:
DESCRIPTION: If a binding.ws configuration specifies both
requires="SOAP.1_2" and wsdlElement="blah#wsdl.binding(jms)" where the jms
WSDL binding is NOT a SOAP/JMS binding, then who wins? the WSDL or the
intent?
Mike also pointed out that a 3rd solution might be to raise an error, but
we can debate that if the issue is accepted.
Thanks Mike!
Dave Booz
STSM, SCA and WebSphere Architecture
Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC
"Distributed objects first, then world hunger"
Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093
e-mail:booz@us.ibm.com
http://washome.austin.ibm.com/xwiki/bin/view/SCA2Team/WebHome
David
Booz/Poughkeepsie
/IBM@IBMUS To
sca-bindings@lists.oasis-open.org
04/16/2008 04:19 cc
PM
Subject
[sca-bindings] NEW ISSUE: Does WSDL
binding take precedend over policy
intents
TARGET: SCA Web Service Binding Spec (WD02 - sca-wsbinding-1
[1].1-spec-WD-02.doc)
DESCRIPTION: If a binding.ws configuration specifies both
requires="SOAP.1_2" and wsdlElement="blah#wsdl.binding(jms)" where the jms
WSDL binding is a SOAP/JMS binding, then who wins? the WSDL or the intent?
PROPOSAL: The WSDL wins.
Dave Booz
STSM, SCA and WebSphere Architecture
Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC
"Distributed objects first, then world hunger"
Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093
e-mail:booz@us.ibm.com
http://washome.austin.ibm.com/xwiki/bin/view/SCA2Team/WebHome
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in
OASIS
at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]