sca-bindings message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [sca-bindings] Some binding issues applied but not marked as such?
- From: Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com>
- To: OASIS Bindings <sca-bindings@lists.oasis-open.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:53:48 +0100
Simon,
I think that the process for moving
Issues from Resolved -> Applied should be done by the editors, as they
incorporate the Issues.
Applied -> Closed is the job of the
TC as a whole - and should be done whenever a new draft is reviewed and
approved (does not
have to be a CD, although that is one
checkpoint that can be used). If an issue is not properly applied,
the TC should move the
issue from Applied -> Resolved and
ask the editors to "try again" !
Yours, Mike.
Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014 Mobile: +44-7802-467431
Email: mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com
From:
| Simon Holdsworth/UK/IBM@IBMGB
|
To:
| Eric Johnson <eric@tibco.com>
|
Cc:
| OASIS Bindings <sca-bindings@lists.oasis-open.org>
|
Date:
| 14/08/2008 15:46
|
Subject:
| Re: [sca-bindings] Some binding issues
applied but not marked as such? |
Eric,
Where possible I've indicated in the JIRA comment for the issue when the
resolution has been applied to the JMS binding but needs applying to other
bindings, and also in the update history at the end of the JMS spec I've
indicated whether issues are fully applied or only the JMS part. For
JMS WD-04, the following issues are applied but also need applying in the
other specs: 13, 30, 32, 38. If these have also now been applied
in the other relevant specs, then they should be moved to "applied".
This raises a question of process - where in the process is there a check
that an issue has been applied - is that an ongoing review obligation on
the TC, or is the vote for a CD also an assertion that the TC agrees that
all issues that it says are applied have been correctly applied? i
say that mainly because once a CD has been voted for, all revision history
up to that point will be removed, so its much harder to verify the application
of resolutions after that point.
Regards, Simon
Simon Holdsworth
STSM, SCA Bindings Architect; Master Inventor; OASIS SCA Bindings TC Chair
MP 211, IBM UK Labs, Hursley Park, Winchester SO21 2JN, UK
Tel +44-1962-815059 (Internal 245059) Fax +44-1962-816898
Internet - Simon_Holdsworth@uk.ibm.com
Eric Johnson <eric@tibco.com>
13/08/2008 18:14
|
To
| OASIS Bindings <sca-bindings@lists.oasis-open.org>
|
cc
|
|
Subject
| [sca-bindings] Some binding issues applied
but not marked as such? |
|
FYI, JIRA currently shows the following issues as applied:
Based on the notes in the margins it appears that, at least for the jmsbinding
spec, there may be some issues applied that have not been marked as such.
#13, #38, for example. Can the editors clarify? I think,
from what I see later in the editing notes, that the issues in question
may apply to multiple specs, and thus are only partially applied.
This raises a question for the committee drafts. Presumably we're
accepting the CD "as-is", but for the JMS spec the issues will
be considered unapplied, even though they have been?
-Eric.
-Eric.
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]