Logged as: http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-49
-Eric.
P.S. I took the editorial liberty of changing the title of the issue in
Jira.
Simon Holdsworth wrote:
OFCF41564A.995EEBCE-ON802574E5.003C9962-802574E5.003CD1C3@uk.ibm.com"
type="cite">
TARGET: SCA WS Binding Specification
cd01
DESCRIPTION:
The schema for binding.ws calls for
the following construct:
<sequence>
<element ref="wsa:EndpointReference"
minOccurs="0"
maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
<any namespace="##other"
processContents="lax" minOccurs="0"
maxOccurs="unbounded"/>
</sequence>
Which leads to a UPA error it you
try
and validate against it. For UPA see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unique_Particle_Attribution
The schema is valid in the sense
that
it's valid and well formed XML but you will get a UPA validation error
if your .composite file has an EndpointReference element within a
binding.ws
element. The problem being that the validator doesn't know if the
EndpointReference
belongs to the <EndpointReference> or <any> schema elements.
PROPOSAL:
It seems difficult to fix this kind
of problem and maintain the ability to support EndpointReference
validation
and binding.ws extensibility without changing the structure of
binding.ws.
Resolution to be determined.
Simon Holdsworth
STSM, SCA Bindings Architect; Master Inventor; OASIS SCA Bindings TC
Chair
MP 211, IBM UK Labs, Hursley Park, Winchester SO21 2JN, UK
Tel +44-1962-815059 (Internal 245059) Fax +44-1962-816898
Internet - Simon_Holdsworth@uk.ibm.com
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with
number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
|