Re: [sca-bindings] RFC 2119 review comments

[Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>]

Bryan,

Thanks for the comments.
Updated rev3 based on your comments.

Specific responses to your comments that were *not* taken care of in rev3:


 >[BA5] We may need a separate issue on WSDL 2.0 not that Assembly has
 >removed it from interface.wsdl

Yes indeed. I didn't want to overreach wrt resolving the 2119 issue. 
This should be a separate issue.

 >[BA6] Why not MAY?

I suppose it could be a 'MAY'. My rationale for replacing 'may' with 
'can' was:
We don't gain anything by saying normative things about what other junk 
one can add to the WSDL document. The WSDL spec already says that. This 
text is just pointing out that runtimes may generate WSDLs that have 
additional stuff in it that WSDL spec allows. Furthermore, I doubt if we 
would have a test for this, which is an important criterion (for me) wrt 
the keywords.

 >[BA7] MUST be

This whole section is scoped to a SHOULD. I, therefore, tried to avoid 
adding 2119 keywords in this section. We should discuss whether we want 
keywords in this section.

 >[BA8] Why not MAY?

Same reason as above. We should discuss this.

-Anish
--

Bryan Aupperle wrote:
> 
> Nice work Anish
> 
> Some minor comments/questions (all as review comment - no in text changes)
> 
> 
> Bryan Aupperle, Ph.D.
> STSM, WebSphere Enterprise Platform Software Solution Architect
> 
> Research Triangle Park,  NC
> +1 919-254-7508 (T/L 444-7508)
> Internet Address: aupperle@us.ibm.com
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php