Re: [sca-bindings] Issue 2: proposal (v7) - an update

[David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com>]

Two questions:

1) why does the text refer specifically to the was:From header block (as opposed to [source endpoint]) in 1) 1), but then refers to [reply endpoint] (as opposed to the was:ReplyTo header block) in 1) 2) ?

2) There is an intent in the policy spec called noListener that can be used on a reference to indicate:

2581 ... This intent can only be used within the @requires attribute of a reference. The
2582 noListener intent MUST only be declared on a @requires attribute of a reference. [POL100004] It
2583 states that the client is not able to handle new inbound connections. It requires that the
2584 binding and callback binding be configured so that any response (or callback) comes either
2585 through a back channel of the connection from the client to the server or by having the
2586 client poll the server for messages. When noListener is present, an SCA Runtime MUST not
2587 establish any connection from a service to a client. [POL100005] An example policy assertion that
2588 would guarantee this is a WS-Policy assertion that applies to the <binding.ws> binding,
2589 which requires the use of WS-Addressing with anonymous responses (e.g.
2590 <wsaw:Anonymous>required</wsaw:Anonymous>” – see
2591 http://www.w3.org/TR/ws-addr-wsdl/#anonelement).

Anish's proposal is in conflict with this feature as it disallows a back channel callback. Anish, how would you like to resolve this conflict? It's too bad that we don't have a way in the policy spec to indicate that a bindingType doesn't support a particular intent. :-)



Dave Booz
STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture
Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC
"Distributed objects first, then world hunger"
Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093
e-mail:booz@us.ibm.com

Mike Edwards ---02/11/2009 05:27:12 AM---Anish, Thanks for doing this.

From:	Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com>
To:	OASIS Bindings <sca-bindings@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date:	02/11/2009 05:27 AM
Subject:	Re: [sca-bindings] Issue 2: proposal (v7) - an update

---

Anish, 

Thanks for doing this. 

I've created an update based on your version which gives this way of doing callbacks a name, 
expresses the optionality and makes some tweaks to the wording of the normative statements 
that I hope makes things clearer.  There are some inline comments plus one question.... 




Yours,  Mike.

Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014    Mobile: +44-7802-467431  
Email:  mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com

From:	Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>
To:	OASIS Bindings <sca-bindings@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date:	11/02/2009 08:05
Subject:	[sca-bindings] Issue 2: proposal (v7)

---

At the last virtual f2f [1] we set the direction for resolution of this 
issue (lot of contentious motions/discussions).

I have applied the changes to version v6 of the proposal (per our 
resolutions) and created v7 (attached). The proposal has all the RFC 
keywords in it. I would like to propose that we make this the resolution 
for this issue, asking the editors to include it binding.ws in a new 
section (with appropriate edits for examples/scenarios). Once this is 
done the only outstanding item coming out of this issue would be to 
include in the conformance section that this new protocol is optional 
(there is a separate issue for the conformance section) -- make this an 
AI for the editors or part of the conformance issue.

-Anish
--

[1] 
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-bindings/download.php/30294/SCA%20Bindings%20minutes%202008-12-01.doc
[attachment "SCA-bindings-issue2-proposal-v7.doc" deleted by Mike Edwards/UK/IBM] ---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

---

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU

[attachment "SCA-bindings-issue2-proposal-v7_mje.doc" deleted by David Booz/Poughkeepsie/IBM] ---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php