OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

sca-bindings message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [sca-bindings] Issue 2 - proposal v8


David Booz wrote:
> The original wording for the note is here:
> 
> In the case where the reference that uses a bidirectional interface 
> cannot accept connections for callbacks from a service (for example, 
> when it has the noListener intent [SCA-Policy]), it should support a 
> polling mechanism. For an example of polling see [WS-MakeConnection].
> 
> Suggested re-wording of that sentence:
> 
> In the case where the reference *binding* that uses a bidirectional 
> interface cannot accept connections for callbacks from a service (for 
> example, when it has the noListener intent [SCA-Policy]), *the binding 
> implementation** needs to *support a polling mechanism *for retrieval of 
> callback request messages*. For an example of polling see 
> [WS-MakeConnection].
> 
> 
> In the above 'needs to' could be changed to 'is encouraged to' and I'd 
> still be ok with it.
> 
Wouldn't an RFC2119 "SHOULD" be appropriate?  This is talking about the
binding implementation, which is a valid conformance target.

   Simon

> Dave Booz
> STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture
> Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC
> "Distributed objects first, then world hunger"
> Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093
> e-mail:booz@us.ibm.com
> 
> Inactive hide details for Anish Karmarkar ---02/12/2009 01:41:38 AM---I 
> accepted the changes that Mike had made in his version Anish Karmarkar 
> ---02/12/2009 01:41:38 AM---I accepted the changes that Mike had made in 
> his version and then made changes agreed to during tod
> 
> 
> From:	
> Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>
> 
> To:	
> OASIS Bindings <sca-bindings@lists.oasis-open.org>
> 
> Date:	
> 02/12/2009 01:41 AM
> 
> Subject:	
> [sca-bindings] Issue 2 - proposal v8
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> I accepted the changes that Mike had made in his version and then made
> changes agreed to during today's call.
> V8 is attached.
> 
> I'll send the ws-policy assertion proposal separately.
> 
> -Anish
> --
> [attachment "SCA-bindings-issue2-proposal-v8.doc" deleted by David 
> Booz/Poughkeepsie/IBM] 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php 
> 




[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]