[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [sca-bindings] Issue 2 - proposal v8
David Booz wrote: > The original wording for the note is here: > > In the case where the reference that uses a bidirectional interface > cannot accept connections for callbacks from a service (for example, > when it has the noListener intent [SCA-Policy]), it should support a > polling mechanism. For an example of polling see [WS-MakeConnection]. > > Suggested re-wording of that sentence: > > In the case where the reference *binding* that uses a bidirectional > interface cannot accept connections for callbacks from a service (for > example, when it has the noListener intent [SCA-Policy]), *the binding > implementation** needs to *support a polling mechanism *for retrieval of > callback request messages*. For an example of polling see > [WS-MakeConnection]. > > > In the above 'needs to' could be changed to 'is encouraged to' and I'd > still be ok with it. > Wouldn't an RFC2119 "SHOULD" be appropriate? This is talking about the binding implementation, which is a valid conformance target. Simon > Dave Booz > STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture > Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC > "Distributed objects first, then world hunger" > Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093 > e-mail:booz@us.ibm.com > > Inactive hide details for Anish Karmarkar ---02/12/2009 01:41:38 AM---I > accepted the changes that Mike had made in his version Anish Karmarkar > ---02/12/2009 01:41:38 AM---I accepted the changes that Mike had made in > his version and then made changes agreed to during tod > > > From: > Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> > > To: > OASIS Bindings <sca-bindings@lists.oasis-open.org> > > Date: > 02/12/2009 01:41 AM > > Subject: > [sca-bindings] Issue 2 - proposal v8 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > I accepted the changes that Mike had made in his version and then made > changes agreed to during today's call. > V8 is attached. > > I'll send the ws-policy assertion proposal separately. > > -Anish > -- > [attachment "SCA-bindings-issue2-proposal-v8.doc" deleted by David > Booz/Poughkeepsie/IBM] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]