[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [sca-bindings] Issue 2 - proposal v8
Simon Nash wrote: > David Booz wrote: >> The original wording for the note is here: >> >> In the case where the reference that uses a bidirectional interface >> cannot accept connections for callbacks from a service (for example, >> when it has the noListener intent [SCA-Policy]), it should support a >> polling mechanism. For an example of polling see [WS-MakeConnection]. >> >> Suggested re-wording of that sentence: >> >> In the case where the reference *binding* that uses a bidirectional >> interface cannot accept connections for callbacks from a service (for >> example, when it has the noListener intent [SCA-Policy]), *the binding >> implementation** needs to *support a polling mechanism *for retrieval >> of callback request messages*. For an example of polling see >> [WS-MakeConnection]. >> >> >> In the above 'needs to' could be changed to 'is encouraged to' and I'd >> still be ok with it. >> > Wouldn't an RFC2119 "SHOULD" be appropriate? This is talking about the > binding implementation, which is a valid conformance target. The 'should' was inadvertent. But you raise a good Q. In fact I'm wondering if we should make the WS-MC itself a "SHOULD". -Anish -- > > Simon > >> Dave Booz >> STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture >> Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC >> "Distributed objects first, then world hunger" >> Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093 >> e-mail:booz@us.ibm.com >> >> Inactive hide details for Anish Karmarkar ---02/12/2009 01:41:38 >> AM---I accepted the changes that Mike had made in his version Anish >> Karmarkar ---02/12/2009 01:41:38 AM---I accepted the changes that Mike >> had made in his version and then made changes agreed to during tod >> >> >> From: >> Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com> >> >> To: >> OASIS Bindings <sca-bindings@lists.oasis-open.org> >> >> Date: >> 02/12/2009 01:41 AM >> >> Subject: >> [sca-bindings] Issue 2 - proposal v8 >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> >> >> I accepted the changes that Mike had made in his version and then made >> changes agreed to during today's call. >> V8 is attached. >> >> I'll send the ws-policy assertion proposal separately. >> >> -Anish >> -- >> [attachment "SCA-bindings-issue2-proposal-v8.doc" deleted by David >> Booz/Poughkeepsie/IBM] >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that >> generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: >> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]