[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Issue 2 proposal version 10
Attached is the proposal for issue 2 v10. This proposal takes the v9 proposal that Mike sent out (and that we agree on), accepts the changes made in that proposal, and adds the following (that we agreed on last week): 1) adds the policy assertion (which was previously sent in a separate doc) 2) includes an example for MakeConnection There are three things that I'll like to note: 1) One change made in the last line of the section titled "Callback Processing using WS-Addressing 1.0 Combined with WS-MakeConnection". This change has not been agreed on by the TC, but is necessary to align it with WS-MC. 2) The TC had agreed to Simon's suggestion that a restriction on MC be noted. This restriction was supposed to be for the case when the service wants to invoke the callback before it responds to the forward request. If I got this right, then I don't think this is a restriction. One can indeed do this with MC. Let's talk about this on the call. 3) Lastly, the formulation that we have agreed to (and that I have retained in this version) is a bad way to write a spec. We repeat the same rules for callbacks without MC and callbacks with MC, with all the 2119 keywords in their full glory. I'm a strong believer in 'define it once and reference is several times'. I do think that we should change this. -Anish --
SCA-bindings-issue2-proposal-v10.pdf
SCA-bindings-issue2-proposal-v10.doc
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]