[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [sca-bindings] Issue 2: proposal v11
See comments inline. Simon Anish Karmarkar wrote: > Eric Johnson wrote: >> There's one point that I tripped on. At the very end, with the example >> using "WS-MakeConnection", you say: >> >> "3) Callback request message (from the service to the reference) sent as >> a “response” to MakeConnection" - Doesn't it need to be simply "callback >> message (from the ..." - I don't see an opportunity for a >> request/response exchange here." >> > > The reason "response" is in quotes is because this would be a response > at the transport/transfer protocol level. When using HTTP, the > MakeConnection SOAP messages is sent with the HTTP request, the SCA > callback request message is sent back on the HTTP response. > >> Do we need to flag, at the first introduction of WS-MakeConnection, that >> it can only be used for one-way operations on the callback interface? >> > > It can be used with a WSDL req-response operation on the callback > interface. This is similar to how WSDL req-res operation works when the > wsa:ReplyTo is non-anonymous. In the case of req-res SCA callback > operation, the message exchange will consists of 2 separate HTTP > connection as follows: > > 1.1) Reference --> [HTTP req msg + MC] --> Service > 1.2) Reference <-- [HTTP res msg + callback req] <-- Service > > 2.1) Reference --> [HTTP req msg + callback res] --> Service > How does the service know that this message contains a callback response rather than a new service request? > 2.2) Reference <-- [HTTP res msg (2xx) + empty entity body] <-- Service > What if the original service request is request/response? This messsage would need to carry the response to that request, not an empty entity body. Is this possible? Another possibility is that the service sends a second callback request. I presume this is OK, and that it would be addressed to the same MC endpoint as the first callback request. To clarify what happens for all these cases, I think we need to add some interaction flow diagrams (similar to the above) for all the one-way and req-res combinations. Simon > -Anish > -- > >> -Eric. >> >> Anish Karmarkar wrote: >>> Thanks for the comments. Mostly agree with all of them. >>> >>> -Anish >>> -- >>> >>> Simon Nash wrote: >>>> Anish, >>>> My comments are inline in the attached document. >>>> >>>> Simon >>>> >>>> Anish Karmarkar wrote: >>>>> Attached. >>>>> >>>>> I accepted changes from v10 and made additional changes as I was >>>>> tasked to do during the last call. This should address all the >>>>> comments/issues so far except for one, which is the name of the >>>>> WS-Policy assertion. >>>>> >>>>> I have changed it from sca:CallbackAssertion to sca:WSCallback. My >>>>> rationale for this is: >>>>> 1) 'Assertion' is redundunt, so removal just makes it shorter and >>>>> shorter is better. >>>>> 2) This is a callback mechanism that is defined for Web services. >>>>> Other bidnings/technologies that are used in SCA may have a >>>>> different mechanism for callback so the previx 'WS' makes sense. >>>>> This constrains it to the realm of Web services. >>>>> >>>>> The other suggestion that was made by Mike was >>>>> sca:CallbackAssertion_WSA. I prefer a WS (or WSA) prefix rather than >>>>> a suffix and the underscore is unnecessary. So I suppose another >>>>> alternative would be 'sca:WSACallback'. >>>>> >>>>> -Anish >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that >>>>> generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: >>>>> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that >>>> generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: >>>> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that >>> generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: >>> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that >> generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: >> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]