[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [sca-bindings] Bindings TC work items
On 2/22/2010 3:12 AM, Simon Holdsworth wrote: > > Folks, > > Given that we've made good progress on resolving issues from the > PR/initial TA documents, I thought I would summarise the work that > remains for the TC. Looking at what remains to be done for the binding > spec docs and TA docs, I would like to aim for the following: > > 25th February: Resolve/close out existing issues (87, 111, 118) > 4th March: Initial discussion on test case documents and test cases; > bindings specs updated and ready for review for cd04; > 11th March: cd04 vote on bindings specs; continue discussion on test > cases; TA documents updated and ready for review for cd01; > 18th March: cd01 vote on TA documents; Initial test case documents and > test cases prepared for discussion/review > 25th March: Submit cd04 of bindings specs for second public review; > submit cd01 of TA documents for public review > > I'm happy to update the JMS and JCA binding specs and TA documents on > this schedule. Anish are you able to do the same for the WS binding and > TA documents? Yes. -Anish -- > If someone could volunteer to take the TC through the testcase document > and code structure on 4th March that would be appreciated. > Also, we will need to start working on the test case document and test > cases some time in the next few weeks. Are there any volunteers to work > on this? > > Here's the current set of work items: > > *_Issues to be resolved:_* > > http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-87: "Web Service callback > standard is best done by the appropriate Web Services working groups" > Main topic for discussion on next week's call (25th February) > > http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-111: "binding.jms uses JMS URI > scheme even though it is not a valid IETF internet draft" > Pending Oracle/JMS URI working group's action on IETF JMS URI > specification. We need to decide how this affects our ability to publish > cd04 if there is no change in the status of the IETF document. > > http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-118: "BWS40005 is ambiguous" > Not yet opened, we need to decide whether to reject or open this. > > *_Applying resolved issues/editorial action items:_* > > _all specs:_ > > 20091015-3 [Editors] Re: BINDINGS-99 point #1 - review and determine > appropriate update to copyright dates (all specs) > 20091015-8 [Editors] Re: BINDINGS-99 point #8 - look at whether the > non-normative references section is relevant still, or needs to be > populated (all specs) > 20091015-9 [Editors] Re: BINDINGS-99 point #9 - clean up naming > conventions section (all specs) > 20091015-10 [Editors] Re: BINDINGS-99 point #10 - look for cleanup to > clarify optionality (all specs) > 20091015-12 [Editors] Re: BINDINGS-99 point #16 - mark Annexes as > normative or not as appropriate (all specs) > > _binding.ws:_ > > http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-84 > http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-86 > http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-91 > http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-92 > http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-112 > http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-114 > http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-115 > http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-116 > http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-119 > > 20100218-2 [Editors] Make corresponding changes in WS spec as per > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bindings/200912/msg00013.html > > Make corresponding updates to the binding.ws TA document > > _binding.jca:_ > > http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-101 > http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-102 > > 20091015-4 [Editors] Re: BINDINGS-99 point #2 - clarify the text > describing the JCA binding (JCA only) > 20091015-5 [Editors] Re: BINDINGS-99 point #3 - revise text to reword or > remove as appropriate (JCA only) > 20091015-7 [Editors] Re: BINDINGS-99 point #6 - clean up the text with > regards to this item (JCA only) > 20091015-11 [Editors] Re: BINDINGS-99 point #11 - do something to > clarify the different uses for the @uri attribute (JCA only) > > Final clean up of the binding.jca TA document required > > _binding.jms:_ > > 20100218-1 [Editors] Make corresponding changes in JMS spec as per > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bindings/200912/msg00013.html > 20100218-3 [Editors] Make corresponding changes in JMS spec as per > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bindings/201002/msg00033.html > > Final clean up of the binding.jms TA document required > > Regards, Simon > > Simon Holdsworth > STSM, SCA Bindings Architect; Master Inventor; OASIS SCA Bindings TC > Chair, AT&T and Boeing Lab Advocate > MP 211, IBM UK Labs, Hursley Park, Winchester SO21 2JN, UK > Tel +44-1962-815059 (Internal 245059) Fax +44-1962-816898 > Internet - Simon_Holdsworth@uk.ibm.com > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > / > / > > /Unless stated otherwise above: > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number > 741598. > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU/ > > > > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]