[sca-bindings] NEW ISSUE: BWS50015's target is a WSDL 1.1. document,is that appropriate?

[Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>]

Title: BWS50015's target is a WSDL 1.1. document, is that appropriate?

Spec: sca-wsbinding-1.1-spec-cd04

Description:

BWS50015 states --
Policies and assertions SHOULD be signed to prevent tampering. [BWS50014]

We haven't defined WSDL 1.1 as a conformance target. Furthermore, 
policies can be inlined in a WSDL document or referenced.

Proposal:

We could go one of two ways, we could define WSDL 1.1 as a target
OR
we could refactor this to state that policy assertions ought to be 
signed without using RFC2119 keywords, and add a requirement that says 
that for a SCA WS Binding XML document to be conformant any policy 
referenced (directly or indirectly) SHOULD be signed.
OR
we could just remove the SHOULD altogether and just talk about this 
without 2119 keywords.

-Anish
--

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php