Re: [sca-bpel-editors] 2119 language on the rest of the document

[Michael Rowley <michael.rowley@activevos.com>]

Editors,

The job really wasn't that big, so I just went ahead and made a pass at 
2119 language for the whole rest of the document.  I will post it to the 
main list.

Michael

Anish Karmarkar wrote:
> Suggestion:
> Although I don't think this is a big task, it might be easier if we do 
> a divide-and-conquer like we did last time.
>
> How about we split the work as follows:
>
> 1) sections 1, 2.2 and 2.3
> 2) sections 2.4, 2.5, 2.6 and 2.7
> 3) sections 3, 3.1, and 3.2
> 4) section 3.3, 3.4, 4, and 5 (this involves filling in the TBD)
>
> The work involves following the approved section 2.1 model + replacing 
> spurious 'may', 'should', 'must', 'optional' etc keywords with 
> appropriate synonyms.
>
> Comments?
>
> Thanks.
>
> -Anish
> -- 
>
> Michael Rowley wrote:
>>
>> SCA BPEL Editors:
>>
>> Time for volunteers.  Who would like to take a cut at converting some 
>> or all of the remaining sections to 2119 language (based on section 
>> 2.1, which we accepted today)?
>>
>> Here is the latest revision 
>> <http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-bpel/download.php/29680/sca-bpel-1.1-spec-cd-01-rev11.doc>. 
>>
>>
>> Michael
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that 
>> generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: 
>> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>