Minutes
Scribe: Danny van der Rijn
Agenda Bashing
Additions - Will we have a 3 July Call?
Additions - Assembly Issue 52 -> BPEL Issue 17
Agenda approved with additions
Approval of Minutes 29 May
Resolution: Minutes of 29th may 2008 approved with no objections. http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bpel/200805/msg00030.html
AI Review
AI 0041 - Mike Rowley has just sent out a proposal for the section 2.1 reworded in RFC 2119 language
3 July Call
<Mike Edwards>
Can we join you at the barbecue?
We'll send you something 'chunky'
Motion to cancel meeting by MR seconded DV
Resolution: july 3rd meeting canceled.
New Issues
Status of spec
CD01 has a later date than CD01-Rev3 because front page and footers have been updated to reflect a decision by liason committee.
Mike Rowley:
Then the version that I just sent out probably has the wrong title page
Anish:
If an editor is incorporating resolved issues or an AI, then it's a RevN
Najeeb has sent work to various editors.
Editors have agreed to work assignments after a bit of horse trading
Editors have agreed to accept an Action Item to incorporate resolved issues by 10 July
Action: Editors to incorporate all issue resolutions by 10 july 2008
Issue 18
There is a proposal from Mike Rowley
<anish>
danny: need to ensure that the language says that if it says it is a sca:service it is a service regardless of the static
analysis (similarly for reference).
the partnerLink specifies sca:service and does not specify sca:refence or a static analysis of the process ..
<Michael Rowley>
If the partnerLink specifies sca:service or it does not specify sca:reference and a a static analysis of the process determines
There will be a statement like the following:
If sca:service is specified, it's a service
If sca:reference is specified, it's a reference
Otherwise, the following rules apply....
[all prettied up with 2119, of course]
ME: Haven't had a chance to read it
MR: This is what went out in April, except for 6 words that changed component generator to SCA Runtime
Anish:
Everyone please read the revision and prepare comments for email and/or next meeting
MR: Rev5 will come out just after the call
Anish:
I'll create Rev6 for people to look at
List of Editors
Anish:
Alex Yiu has left the TC, hasn't made editorial contributions.
Martin:
Move to remove Alex Yiu as an editor, and place him in the list of past and present TC members. MR second
Dieter:
Alex already on other list
Martin accepts Dieter's revision as a friendly amendment
Motion unanimously approved
Resolution: Alex's name to be removed from the editors' list
AI to MR to make that change in Rev5
Dieter:
The editing pen will be passed around?
Anish:
Mike has it for Rev5, Anish has it for Rev6. Use the editors list to coordinate after that
Anish:
Can we pick the next pen-holder after Rev6 now?
MR: Assume that it goes in email document order
Martin:
Let's coordinate on editors list
Dieter:
Not a good week. Can someone else go first?
Anish:
Not going to happen here. Take Martin's suggestion to do it on the editors list
Schreiber diagnostics output
[Delete this section before publishing the minutes]
citation-detection-scribed: Line 92: Check for possible unrecognized nick 'If sca'
citation-detection-scribed: Line 94: Check for possible unrecognized nick 'If sca'
statistics: Schreiber found 80 input lines
edits: Schreiber found the following text-edit commands:
edits: Line 33: Danny: s/Minute/Minutes/
command-scribe: Line 2: Danny van der Rijn recognized
command-scribe: Schreiber detected that this section was scribed online
edit-substitute: command on line 33 succeeded, changed line 31 from 'Minute' to 'Minutes'
edit-delete: Line 33 was deleted
system: Transformer: SAXON 9.0.0.2
[End of Schreiber diagnostic output]