Scribe: Danny van der Rijn
Additions - Will we have a 3 July Call?
Additions - Assembly Issue 52 -> BPEL Issue 17
Agenda approved with additions
Approval of Minutes 29 May
Resolution: Minutes of 29th may 2008 approved with no objections. http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bpel/200805/msg00030.html
AI 0041 - Mike Rowley has just sent out a proposal for the section 2.1 reworded in RFC 2119 language
3 July Call
Can we join you at the barbecue?
We'll send you something 'chunky'
Motion to cancel meeting by MR seconded DV
Resolution: july 3rd meeting canceled.
Status of spec
CD01 has a later date than CD01-Rev3 because front page and footers have been updated to reflect a decision by liason committee.
Then the version that I just sent out probably has the wrong title page
If an editor is incorporating resolved issues or an AI, then it's a RevN
Najeeb has sent work to various editors.
Editors have agreed to work assignments after a bit of horse trading
Editors have agreed to accept an Action Item to incorporate resolved issues by 10 July
Action: Editors to incorporate all issue resolutions by 10 july 2008
There is a proposal from Mike Rowley
danny: need to ensure that the language says that if it says it is a sca:service it is a service regardless of the static
analysis (similarly for reference).
the partnerLink specifies sca:service and does not specify sca:refence or a static analysis of the process ..
If the partnerLink specifies sca:service or it does not specify sca:reference and a a static analysis of the process determines
There will be a statement like the following:
If sca:service is specified, it's a service
If sca:reference is specified, it's a reference
Otherwise, the following rules apply....
[all prettied up with 2119, of course]
ME: Haven't had a chance to read it
MR: This is what went out in April, except for 6 words that changed component generator to SCA Runtime
Everyone please read the revision and prepare comments for email and/or next meeting
MR: Rev5 will come out just after the call
I'll create Rev6 for people to look at
List of Editors
Alex Yiu has left the TC, hasn't made editorial contributions.
Move to remove Alex Yiu as an editor, and place him in the list of past and present TC members. MR second
Alex already on other list
Martin accepts Dieter's revision as a friendly amendment
Motion unanimously approved
Resolution: Alex's name to be removed from the editors' list
AI to MR to make that change in Rev5
The editing pen will be passed around?
Mike has it for Rev5, Anish has it for Rev6. Use the editors list to coordinate after that
Can we pick the next pen-holder after Rev6 now?
MR: Assume that it goes in email document order
Let's coordinate on editors list
Not a good week. Can someone else go first?
Not going to happen here. Take Martin's suggestion to do it on the editors list
Schreiber diagnostics output
[Delete this section before publishing the minutes]
citation-detection-scribed: Line 92: Check for possible unrecognized nick 'If sca'
citation-detection-scribed: Line 94: Check for possible unrecognized nick 'If sca'
statistics: Schreiber found 80 input lines
edits: Schreiber found the following text-edit commands:
edits: Line 33: Danny: s/Minute/Minutes/
command-scribe: Line 2: Danny van der Rijn recognized
command-scribe: Schreiber detected that this section was scribed online
edit-substitute: command on line 33 succeeded, changed line 31 from 'Minute' to 'Minutes'
edit-delete: Line 33 was deleted
system: Transformer: SAXON 220.127.116.11
[End of Schreiber diagnostic output]