Re: [sca-bpel] Assembly issue 54 (interface.partnerLinkType) wasCNAed

[Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>]

I see it differently.
Assembly defines interface.wsdl, all other interface types are defined 
else where. Currently in SCA we only have interface.java and 
interface.wsdl. interface.java is defined in the java specs not in the 
assembly spec.

If we were to create a interface.partnerlinkType spec, we can ask the 
assembly spec to add examples containing interface.partnerlinkType. This 
is how interface.java is structured right now.

-Anish
--

Danny van der Rijn wrote:
> If it's not in assembly, it doesn't do us much good to have it.
> 
> Anish Karmarkar wrote:
>>
>> At the recent Assembly f2f meeting, assembly issue 54
>> (http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/ASSEMBLY-54) was closed-with-no-action.
>>
>> So this issue comes back to us. Do we want to create a standalone spec
>> (independent of BPEL C&I) for interface.partnerlinkType ?
>>
>> -Anish
>> --
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
>> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
>> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>>