OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

sca-bpel message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: Re: [sca-bpel] Assembly issue 54 (interface.partnerLinkType) wasCNAed

Title: Re: [sca-bpel] Assembly issue 54 (interface.partnerLinkType) was CNAed
I have had internal discussions that have set me straight.  I now agree with your approach.

Anish Karmarkar wrote:
48EBF083.4080207@oracle.com" type="cite">

I see it differently.
Assembly defines interface.wsdl, all other interface types are defined
else where. Currently in SCA we only have interface.java and
interface.wsdl. interface.java is defined in the java specs not in the
assembly spec.

If we were to create a interface.partnerlinkType spec, we can ask the
assembly spec to add examples containing interface.partnerlinkType. This
is how interface.java is structured right now.


Danny van der Rijn wrote:
> If it's not in assembly, it doesn't do us much good to have it.
> Anish Karmarkar wrote:
>> At the recent Assembly f2f meeting, assembly issue 54
>> (http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/ASSEMBLY-54) was closed-with-no-action.
>> So this issue comes back to us. Do we want to create a standalone spec
>> (independent of BPEL C&I) for interface.partnerlinkType ?
>> -Anish
>> --
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
>> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
>> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]