[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Removing the complexity of merging derived component types with sidefiles
I'm sending this email on behalf of SCA BPEL TC. I would like to request that this be put on the next liaison call agenda. With recent action by the assembly committee (Assembly 36) it is left to each C&I to develop rules stating how an Introspected Component Type and a Component Type Side File are merged to arrive at an Effective Component Type. It is the opinion of the BPEL C&I committee that the following convention be adopted by all C&Is: - In the case of a C&I where it is possible and convenient to derive a Component Type from implementation files, then such derivation rules SHOULD be specified, and use of a Component Type Side File be disallowed. - In cases where it is not possible or convenient to derive a Component Type, a Component Type Side File SHOULD be specified, and no derivation rules be allowed. This decision is to be made on a per C&I basis, not a per-component basis. The end result is that each C&I either has derivation rules, or a component-type side file, and no rules for merging need be specified. Thanks. -Anish Karmarkar SCA BPEL TC co-chair --
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]