[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [sca-j] @Reference annotation on setter method parameter or the methoditself?
Hi Simon,
If the issue has already been resolved and the TC feels that the proposed
wording is sufficiently clear, I am alright with the adapted resolution and
do not want to reopen the issue. Since the draft
sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-WD-01.doc available at
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/27997/sca-javacaa-1.1-spec-WD-01.doc
did not incorporate this change, I thought it would still be possible to
change it. And when it comes to choosing between "sufficiently clear" and
"clear", I would choose "clear", but this is a personal choice :)
++Vamsi
Simon Nash
<NASH@uk.ibm.com>
To
28/04/2008 16:39 sca-j@lists.oasis-open.org
cc
Subject
Re: [sca-j] @Reference annotation
on setter method parameter or the
method itself?
Vamsi,
JAVA-33 is resolved. Please see the minutes of the sca-j call of April
3. The proposed wording change in the JIRA was adopted. The point you are
making was raised (by myself!) when the TC discussed the motion to resolve
the issue. Other TC members felt that the proposed wording was
sufficiently clear, so I did not press this to a vote. Are you OK with the
wording that was adopted, or do you want to reopen the issue with a
proposal to change the wording?
Simon
Simon C. Nash, IBM Distinguished Engineer
Member of the IBM Academy of Technology
Tel. +44-1962-815156 Fax +44-1962-818999
C Vamsi
<vamsic007@in.ibm.com>
To
28/04/2008 05:05 Simon Nash/UK/IBM@IBMGB
cc
sca-j@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject
Re: [sca-j] @Reference
annotation on setter method
parameter or the method
itself?
Hi Simon,
Thank you for pointing to JAVA-33. I failed to locate that issue since
"Java Common Annotations and APIs specification" is not marked as the
component affected by this issue. I don't think JAVA-33 is resolved yet as
I notice that the text in section 2.1.4 of v1.1 draft does not reflect the
resolution and even the status at http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-33
is still shown as "New". Though the current proposal for JAVA-33 changes
"setter method parameter" to "setter method", it is not the setter method
but the parameter to the setter method that is typed by the service
interface. I am alright if my proposed resolution gets considered under
JAVA-33 itself.
++Vamsi
Simon Nash
<NASH@uk.ibm.com>
To
28/04/2008 03:00 sca-j@lists.oasis-open.org
cc
Subject
Re: [sca-j] @Reference annotation
on setter method parameter or the
method itself?
Vamsi,
This appears to be a duplicate of JAVA-33. Were you intending to reopen
that issue (which would require a 2/3 majority), or are you OK with the
change made to this text by the resolution to JAVA-33?
Simon
Simon C. Nash, IBM Distinguished Engineer
Member of the IBM Academy of Technology
Tel. +44-1962-815156 Fax +44-1962-818999
C Vamsi
<vamsic007@in.ibm.com>
To
26/04/2008 09:51 sca-j@lists.oasis-open.org
cc
Subject
[sca-j] @Reference annotation
on setter method parameter or
the method itself?
DESCRIPTION:
Java Common Annotations and APIs Specification v1.00 - Sec 1.2.2 - Lines
245 to 246:
245 Accessing a service using reference injection is done by defining a
field, a setter method parameter, or a
246 constructor parameter typed by the service interface and annotated with
an @Reference annotation.
From the above it could be interpreted that the parameter to the setter
method can be annotated with @Reference whereas section 1.8.14 does not
talk about or give an example where a parameter to the setter method is
annotated with @Reference, but mentions that the setter method itself (not
the input parameter) should be annotated with @Reference.
PROPOSAL: Change lines 245 and 246 to read the following:
Accessing a service using reference injection is done by defining a field,
a setter method with input parameter typed by the service interface, or a
constructor parameter typed by the service interface and annotated with an
@Reference annotation.
++Vamsi
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in
OASIS
at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]