Re: [sca-j] Clarification about "Unannotaded Implementation"

[Simon Nash <NASH@uk.ibm.com>]

Luciano,
From reading the text in this section,
I think it's referring to an implementation that does not contain any @Reference
or @Property annotations.  However, there could be other SCA annotations.

    Simon

Simon C. Nash, IBM Distinguished Engineer
Member of the IBM Academy of Technology
Tel. +44-1962-815156  Fax +44-1962-818999

"Luciano Resende" <luciano_resende@us.ibm.com>

13/05/2008 05:30

To	sca-j@lists.oasis-open.org
cc
Subject	[sca-j] Clarification about "Unannotaded Implementation"

In the 1.0 Spec, section 1.2.7 describe the the rules for determining the
properties and reference for Unannotaded Implementations.

Please consider the two scenarios : 

1.No @Reference and/or @Property or anyother SCA annotations
2.Partial usage of SCA Annotations with some unannotated references

Witch of this would be considered a "Unannotaded Implementation"
? 
Is an Implementation considered Unannotaded only when there is no SCA annotations
present on the implementation artifact ? 

Thanks 
Luciano Resende 

--------------------------------------------------------------------- To
unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates
this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php

---

Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU