[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [sca-j] SCA-J Working Draft 04 Review Comments
All of these fixed in WD05 except as noted below. -Anish -- Mark Combellack wrote: > Hi, > > > > Having reviewed the changes in WD04 version of the SCA-J specifications, > I have the following comments: > > > > > > *Editorial issues that should be fixed before we publish a CD* > > > > Document Footer: > > Document version is wrong – it has WD03 but this is WD04 > > Date is wrong – title page says 15 August 2008 but footer says 27 May > 2008-09-15 > > > > PDF Document: > > Page numbers are wrong in the footer. It has Page 1 of 1, Page 2 of 2, > etc. The Word document is correct. > > > > > > > > *Minor Editorial issues that don’t need to be fixed before we publish a CD* > > > > Page 7 – line 15 > > Extra space between end of sentence and full stop (.) > > > > Page 17 – line 332 > > The code is coloured differently to the rest of the document. The > keywords public and boolean should be purple > > Actually – this is a general problem throughout the specification. Some > code is coloured – other code is not. > The general problem is not fixed. > > > Page 17 – line 359 > > Text is using the wrong font size (10 point.) The rest of the document > uses 9 point font size. This is not visible in the PDF version of the > specification but can be seen as the text being “more bold” in the Word > version. > > > > Page 27 – line 780 > > Remove extra space between ServiceReference<B> and extends > > > > Page 27 – line 795 > > Supplied is spelt wrongly – in the document it is spelt suppied > > > > Page 39 – line 1349 > > Section is missing example of using @Property with a Constructor. It has > examples for the other two cases. > Not done. > > > Page 40 – line 1408 > > Section is missing example of using @Reference with a Constructor. It > has examples for the other two cases. > Not done. > > > Page 60 – lines 2235 to 2260 > > Text is using the wrong font size (10 point.) The rest of the document > uses 9 point font size. This is not visible in the PDF version of the > specification but can be seen as the text being “more bold” in the Word > version. > > > > > > *QUESTIONS* > > > > I thought we agreed that we would update the style of the references > from [1] to [RFC2119]? Or was this for the Assembly specification? > > Can't remember either, so not fixed. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Mark > > Mark Combellack| Software Developer| Avaya | Eastern Business Park | St. > Mellons | Cardiff | CF3 5EA | Voice: +44 (0) 29 2081 7624 | > mcombellack@avaya.com <mailto:|mcombellack@avaya.com> > > > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]