OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

sca-j message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 24: The EJB bindings specification should provideexplicity statesupport or non-support for Callbacks - proposal v2


Thanks for reviewing.

1) Added the missing '>'.

2) I also noticed that the assembly and policy specs never mention the extensibility points, not even in the list of valid child elements. So we are inconsistent all over the place anyway. I was actually thinking of removing them from the text to be more consistent with assembly and policy. What would the pseudo schema look like with those additions?

Dave Booz
STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture
Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC
"Distributed objects first, then world hunger"
Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093
e-mail:booz@us.ibm.com

Inactive hide details for Mike Edwards ---06/11/2009 02:53:14 AM---Dave, Comments:Mike Edwards ---06/11/2009 02:53:14 AM---Dave, Comments:


From:

Mike Edwards <mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com>

To:

"OASIS Java" <sca-j@lists.oasis-open.org>

Date:

06/11/2009 02:53 AM

Subject:

Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 24: The EJB bindings specification should provide explicity statesupport or non-support for Callbacks - proposal v2






Dave,

Comments:

1) Typo on line 65 - missing ">" at end of line

2) A comment about all the Bindings specs including this one
- the any attribute and any subelement are described in the text but not mentioned in the pseudo-schema (of course, they are in
the main schema). I find this odd. I suggest adding them to the pseudo-schema.

Otherwise, it's fine....

Yours, Mike.

Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014 Mobile: +44-7802-467431
Email: mike_edwards@uk.ibm.com

From: David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com>
To: sca-j@lists.oasis-open.org
Cc: Simon Holdsworth/UK/IBM@IBMGB
Date: 10/06/2009 14:54
Subject: [sca-j] ISSUE 24: The EJB bindings specification should provide explicity statesupport or non-support for Callbacks - proposal v2





Here's a list of changes made to the proposal, and the v2 proposal is attached. As I cannot make the Telecon this coming Friday, please please please comment in email. We can resolve this in my absence if I can make everyone happy via email.

1) Updated pseudo-schema and bulletted list that explains elements and attributes as per Simon's comment about extensibility missing from pseudo-schema. Used binding.ws as a model.
2) Schema uses ##any for anyAttribute namespace. I originally copied this from binding.ws, so it's wrong in binding.ws also.
3) Updated the wording in new section 7 to cover the suggestion made during the last telecon.


(See attached file: sca-ejbbinding-1.1-spec-wd-03+issue24_v2.doc)


Dave Booz
STSM, BPM and SCA Architecture
Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC and SCA-J TC
"Distributed objects first, then world hunger"
Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093
e-mail:booz@us.ibm.com
[attachment "sca-ejbbinding-1.1-spec-wd-03+issue24_v2.doc" deleted by Mike Edwards/UK/IBM] ---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:

https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php 






Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU







[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]