RE: [sdo] ISSUE 66: Proposed Resolution

["Radu Preotiuc-Pietro" <radup@bea.com>]

Title: ISSUE 66: Proposed Resolution

As a matter of style, instead of:

 

"Consider a context C2, then the method

     DataObject O2 = C2.getDataHelper().project(O1);

 

throws an exception if C2 does not define a type that is compatible to T1 according to the definition in section 4.5.4.  However, if C2 does define a Type T2, that is compatible to T1, then this method returns

"

I would prefer something along the lines of:

 

"Consider a context C2 and a type T2 where T2.getHelperContext() is C2 and T2 is compatible with T1 according to the definition in section 4.5.4. Then the method

 

DataObject O2 = C2.getDataHelper().project(O1);

 

returns [...]

 

If there is no such type T2 in context C2, an exception is thrown."

 

It kind of emphasizes the non-error case rather than the other way around in the original formulation.

 

Radu

---

From: Barack, Ron [mailto:ron.barack@sap.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 6:52 AM
To: sdo@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [sdo] ISSUE 66: Proposed Resolution

<<ISSUE 66 Proposed Resolution.doc>>
Hi Everyone,

I've removed references to POJO objects. 

Ron

Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may contain information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and  affiliated entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted  and/or legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, and have received this message in error, please immediately return this by email and then delete it.