RE: [search-ws] Groups - cql-2-0-draft-oct 15.doc uploaded

["LeVan,Ralph" <levan@oclc.org>]

Line 345: (a) search clause...

It would have been nice if 5.1.1 had defined Level 0 conformance as supporting a single searchTerm and provided the definition of that term so that section 5.1.2 would have searchTerm defined already.

I'd use "searchTerm 1 AND searchTerm 2".

5.1.3:  That's a huge leap from Level 1.  Do we really require that a client be able to formulate "all queries described in this standard"?  How about just anything more complex than Level 1?  If I can formulate "searchClause1 BOOLEAN searchClause 2", I'm more than Level 1.  How about if Level 2 mandates an Explain record that describes how much of CQL you can support?

5.2.1: Point 2 is confusing.  Rather than "any unsupported query", how about "a query more complex than a single searchTerm"?

Ralph


> -----Original Message-----
> From: rden@loc.gov [mailto:rden@loc.gov]
> Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2009 6:11 PM
> To: search-ws@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: [search-ws] Groups - cql-2-0-draft-oct 15.doc uploaded
> 
> I have added a model section at the front and a conformance section before
> the first annex.  Please review.
> 
> --Ray
> 
>  -- Ray Denenberg
> 
> The document named cql-2-0-draft-oct 15.doc has been submitted by Ray
> Denenberg to the OASIS Search Web Services TC document repository.
> 
> Document Description:
> 
> 
> View Document Details:
> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=34723
> 
> Download Document:
> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/34723/cql-2-0-draft-
> oct%2015.doc
> 
> 
> PLEASE NOTE:  If the above links do not work for you, your email application
> may be breaking the link into two pieces.  You may be able to copy and paste
> the entire link address into the address field of your web browser.
> 
> -OASIS Open Administration