Re: [security-jc] W3C Web Services Architecture WG

[Phil Griffin <phil.griffin@asn-1.com>]

Darran and Karl,

Sorry that I missed the "security announcement"
that is mentioned below. Could one of you copy this
announcement to the SJC list?

Also, I'm a bit lost at your statement that the
"ws-security group was "rebuked" by W3C". Is this
rebuked group not the one that just threw ws-arch
a curve by starting a ws-security TC?

Phil


Darran Rolls wrote:

> [cross posted to thread relevant thread on security-services TC list]
> 
>  
> 
> I?m participating in the W3C ws-arch activity.  As you know, this group 
> is in the process of chartering a WS security WG.  Obviously today?s 
> ws-security announcement threw them a curve ball  - of course I 
> maintained the integrity of the SSJC?s conversation on this matter 
> earlier this week. 
> 
>  
> 
> After much debate, the group *may be* holding on their charter until 
> they gain a better understanding of what the new OASIS TC has and is 
> likely to charter. 
> 
>  
> 
> Obviously we need to open both formal and informal channels between the 
> two groups.  During the meeting I explained the OASIS process and IPR to 
> the group and took an action item to inform the SSJC of their desire to 
> better understand the scope of the new TC and help lay a path for 
> liaison and cross-pollination. 
> 
>  
> 
> I am however somewhat concerned about a notes on the sstc list that said 
> that the ws-security group was ?rebuked? by W3C in a way that might 
> effect establishing a working relationship.  Could someone please 
> explain the course of events that led to this situation and/or suggest 
> how best to move this forward? 
> 
>  
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Darran Rolls                      http://www.waveset.com
> 
> Waveset Technologies Inc          drolls@waveset.com
> 
> (512) 657 8360                   
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------
> 
>  
>