RE: [security-jc] PR on SSJC site -was"6/17/2002: Discussion of charter for SSJC"

[Darran Rolls <Darran.Rolls@waveset.com>]

> From: Phil Griffin [mailto:phil.griffin@asn-1.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 6:21 PM
> To: Security Joint Committee
> Subject: Re: [security-jc] PR on SSJC site - was"6/17/2002: Discussion
of
> charter for SSJC"
> 
> 
> 
> Darran Rolls wrote:
> 
> > <late reply/>
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Phil Griffin [mailto:phil.griffin@asn-1.com]
> >>Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 8:36 AM
> >>To: Security Joint Committee
> >>Subject: Re: [security-jc] 6/17/2002: Discussion of charter for SSJC
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>Monica Martin wrote:
> >>
> >>>With regards to (3):  Suggest we assist in decreasing overlap
> >>>
> > between
> >
> >>>security related development work within OASIS (and beyond as
> >>>appropriate) and promote collaboration among the related security
> >>>technical committees.  As for a specific roadmap, perhaps this
> >>>
> > includes
> >
> >>>an architecture that at least shows the potential relationships,
> >>>dependencies and interfaces between efforts.
> >>>
> >>>With the increased focus within OASIS to increase collaboration
> >>>
> > outside
> >
> >>>of its membership (liaisions, collaboration, etc), this may at
least
> >>>indirectly be a component of our work.  Should be a part of our
> >>>
> > charter?
> >
> >>Seems reasonable to me. Also I wonder if helping to
> >>publicize OASIS security work should be in our
> >>charter. Right now there is one known opportunity
> >>to promote SAML at the Digital ID world conference.
> >>And I'm speaking at RSA 2002 Paris on CXER use in
> >>XCBF. Maybe our SJC web page could have pointers to
> >>presentation materials developed by OASIS security
> >>TCs and announcements of events where our works
> >>have been promoted.
> >>
> >
> >
> > Should we restrict this to SSJC specific PR or open to include any
> > member TC event?  Example, the SAML inter-op the week after next.
I'd
> > say the former...
> 
> 
> I can't quite imagine what SJC specific PR might include.
> See http://www.digitalidworld.com/conference/2002/speakers.html
> where "Security Standards Joint Committee (SSJC)" is mentioned.

I have no great issue with this, just that if the above is an XCBF talk
it might be best referenced from the XCBF page...

> That said, when we evolve to a point where membership is
> open to any TC, being more specific than SJC PR would seem
> problematic.
> 
> BTW. Our mailing list would indicate "SJC" but I waffle
> between "SJC" and "SSJC". Which is correct?

I prefer SSJC but will happily adopt a common reference based on
consensus.

--------------------------------------------------------
Darran Rolls                      http://www.waveset.com
Waveset Technologies Inc          drolls@waveset.com 
(512) 657 8360                    
--------------------------------------------------------