[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: Embarrassing episode with conference call
Hal, Marc, I'm sure you're right Hal, and this is just a hangover from some previous conf. call instruction. As to costs: I'm not sure how we could share 'em, unless we rotate or oasis have some scheme. (Maybe we can buy Marc & Prateek lots of beer at all the F2F meetings:-) Stephen. Hal Lockhart wrote: > > Personally I have no concerns and I am probably as sensitive to this as > anybody. I believe this is the service Netegrity uses internally. I suspect > that the instructions may have been given for some Netegrity internal > concall where they (quite legitimately) wanted to make sure to exclude > competitors. Somehow these instructions got applied to our call. > > Marc raises a good point. I would hate to see one party get stuck with the > tab forever. Maybe the companies could cover the cost on a rotating basis. > We would certainly be glad to pay for some of them. > > Hal > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Chanliau, Marc [mailto:MChanliau@netegrity.com] > > Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2001 11:10 AM > > To: Eve L. Maler; Chanliau, Marc; > > security-services@lists.oasis-open.org > > Cc: elm@east.sun.com > > Subject: RE: Embarrassing episode with conference call > > > > > > Wow!!!! I was not aware of this. I sure apologize, although > > I'm not sure for > > what. Just thinking that Netegrity would do anything to preclude > > participants from participating in an open standards group > > discussion is > > insulting enough. To remove any doubt, maybe somebody else > > should organize > > those calls. I've done that (using my company's money) to help the TC > > community, certainly not to bar members from being included. > > I will call the > > conference organization which handled that call and let you > > all know what > > really happened. > > Marc Chanliau > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Eve L. Maler [mailto:eve.maler@east.sun.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 10:52 PM > > To: mchanliau@netegrity.com > > Cc: elm@east.sun.com > > Subject: Embarrassing episode with conference call > > > > > > Hi Marc-- I'm not sure if you joined the call on Tuesday in > > time to hear > > the problem we had with the conference company. They were > > holding back > > from letting Securant and Entrust join the call because they had > > instructions not to let them on! I suggest you get them to > > remove that > > from their records, and also send an apology to at least > > Darren (who we > > know was held back for about 15 minutes) and possibly the > > others -- maybe > > even the whole list. Or if this was some aberration and the > > conference > > company never should have had this instruction, an > > explanation of this > > would be great. I don't want there to be any lingering doubt that > > Netegrity is fully supporting this open standards effort, > > which would look > > bad for you and hurt the group's work... > > > > Eve > > -- > > Eve Maler +1 781 442 3190 > > Sun Microsystems XML Technology Center eve.maler @ east.sun.com > > -- ____________________________________________________________ Stephen Farrell Baltimore Technologies, tel: (direct line) +353 1 881 6716 39 Parkgate Street, fax: +353 1 881 7000 Dublin 8. mailto:stephen.farrell@baltimore.ie Ireland http://www.baltimore.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC