RE: [security-services] A "final" proposal on status codes

["Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>]

I was under the impression that all the comments on the core document were
to take place on the security services list.

Phillip Hallam-Baker FBCS C.Eng.
Principal Scientist
VeriSign Inc.
pbaker@verisign.com
781 245 6996 x227


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rich Salz [mailto:rsalz@zolera.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 8:39 PM
> To: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
> Cc: Scott Cantor; SAML
> Subject: Re: [security-services] A "final" proposal on status codes
> 
> 
> > Is the recursive inclusion in Substatus code type 
> intentional?? I have
> > assumed not since if it were intentional I would have 
> expected notice to be
> > drawn to it.
> 
> Yes it is.  I lost; I wanted a simple array. :)
> 
> Scott probably did not draw attention to it because it got a 
> fair amount
> of discussion on the XMLP list, and when he context-switched 
> to here, he
> retained too much context. :)
> 	.r$
> 
> -- 
> Zolera Systems, Securing web services (XML, SOAP, Signatures,
> Encryption)
> http://www.zolera.com
>

Phillip Hallam-Baker (E-mail).vcf