RE: [security-services] Minutes for Telecon, Tuesday 4 February 2 002

["Philpott, Robert" <rphilpott@rsasecurity.com>]

> >>   AI-15. Editor (Eve) to update documents with Eve's fragment ID
> >>          recommendations
> >>
> > - Prateek: is this not [A-6]?
> > - Rob: thinks we just need Eve on call to close this
> > - Jeff: thinks this is the step of incorporating the proposal into the
> >   docs
> > - still open
> 
> That's correct, it's still open.  I'm sorry about this.  On the last
> call that I took part in, Rob mentioned he could help with some
> editorial tasks, and I thought I sent him mail asking if he's interested
> in taking this on.  But I just heard today from hal that Rob has had
> some email problems, and I can't find my copy anyway, so maybe it wasn't
> seen/sent.  So, Rob...are you interested? :-)
> 

yes - I got that mail... It's just buried in my backlog at the moment. Right
after I volunteered, some things came up at the office and I got swamped.
I'm just starting to dig out and could probably do some editing in a couple
of weeks.  I know I can't get to it prior to the next meeting.


> >>   AI-20. Eve to update specs to 1.0
> >>
> > - still open
> 
> Here's the status on this.  I asked, in the last call I took part in, if
> I should update the specs before vs. after the OASIS staff gets the
> unique numbering system for specs in place.  (It would be like the IETF
> RFC numbering.)  I was told to wait until they do that.  But that
> depends, somewhat, on my finishing the filenaming proposal that the TC
> chairs have been working on, and convincing Karl that it's baked enough
> for him to go ahead and do the assignments of all the numbers.
> 
> I've finished the filenaming proposal, finally, and just need to format
> it and send it out.  I will be able to do that in the next day.  But
> then Karl still needs to assign the numbers, and that's an external
> variable.
> 
> If you want me to update the specs prior to all that, let me know...
> 

My only concern is whether Karl will be swamped with Kavi migration to do
the assignments.  But this isn't really critical, really, and feel we can
wait.
 
> >
> >>   AI-33. Eve to update the charter based on discussion
> >>
> > - still open
> 
> Here's the status.  I was supposed to (a) make some editorial changes,
> and also (b) check with some Sun legal people and some LegalXML TC
> people about options for and meanings of various IPR formulations.  I
> wrote to the LegalXML people, but still need to check around with Sun
> lawyers and think about what I've been told.  I can make the editorial
> changes, prior to coming up with an IPR recommendation; I will do that
> (and hopefully both) by early next week.
> 

Sounds good.  Obviously, we do need to try and close on this as soon as we
can since, technically, the TC is currently running without a valid charter.