[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [security-services] A possibly contentious submission
Good paper. The main thing missing is any mention of the conditions/advice semantics which was supposed to function similiarly to the SOAP mustUnderstand. Hal > -----Original Message----- > From: Scott Cantor [mailto:cantor.2@osu.edu] > Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 3:12 PM > To: SAML > Subject: [security-services] A possibly contentious submission > > > Well, I promised to start an argument, so here goes. I've been > going around on a lot this stuff with various people in the Liberty > Alliance, so I'm fairly certain I'm in a small minority, but FWIW. > > The last section sums up my viewpoint on what's wrong with the > versioning approaches that I think are typical right now, and lays > out my particular thinking. The disconnect at least helps me > understand why I'm confused, so even if you all throw this out in > disgust, it wasn't wasted (or even a lot of) effort on my part. > > The gist is that I think we're headed down the wrong road if we > change namespaces every time we release a spec, and I can't really > tell if that's what people think we should do or not. > > WRT the XML signature issues, the irony is that I believe we > can't make the changes we need to make to add ID attributes and still > call this a minor revision, unfortunately. Perhaps the upside is > that if what people think is minor is way beyond my definition, we > probably can. > > -- Scott > ---------------------------------------------------------------- To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]